EC Paediatrics

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of physicians who are covering delivery rooms toward APGAR score at the Ministry of Health Hospitals in Al-Qassim province, Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted among pediatric physicians at different Ministry of Health Hospitals in Qassim province, Saudi Arabia. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed among the targeted physicians using an online survey. The questionnaire includes socio-demographic data, a questionnaire that assesses knowledge toward APGAR score, and a questionnaire that measures the attitude and practice of APGAR score.

Results: Of the 138 pediatric physicians, 63% were males and 38.4% were aged between 36 to 45 years old. The overall mean knowledge score was 6.04 (SD 1.17) out of 7 points. For attitude, the overall mean attitude score was 48.5 (SD 1.72) out of 60 points with nearly all physicians (88.4%) estimated to have a positive attitude, and the rest were neutral (11.6%). Factors associated with increased knowledge were being more experienced, being more educated, and being a consultant while being a resident was the factor associated with increased attitude.

Conclusion: The knowledge and attitude of pediatric physicians toward the APGAR score were sufficient. Older physicians who have higher education and years of experience were more likely to demonstrate better knowledge, however, the attitude and practices toward the APGAR scores were more likely demonstrated by the resident physicians. More research is needed to shed more light on the knowledge and attitude of pediatric physicians in our region.

Keywords: APGAR Score; Pediatric Physician; Knowledge; Attitude; Practice

1. Apgar V. “A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn”. Critical Care449 (1952): 97.
2. Apgar V., et al. “Evaluation of the newborn infant-second report”. The Journal of the American Medical Association15 (1958): 1985-1988.
3. Pediatrics AA. “Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation (NRP)”. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics (2016).
4. Iyer R. “The Apgar Score”. Pediatrics3 (2006): 1314.
5. Casey BM., et al. “The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of of newborn infants”. The New England Journal of Medicine7 (2001): 467-471.
6. Jepson HA., et al. “The Apgar score: evolution, limitations, and scoring guidelines”. Birth2 (1991): 83-92.
7. Ige OO., et al. “Knowledge and application of APGAR score among residents in a tertiary hospital”. Sahel Medical Journal 18 (2015): 1.
8. Alsheekh AAM and Etawa BBM. “Impact of the training program on Nurse Midwives Knowledge regarding Apgar score”. MULTI-KNOWLEDGE Electronic Comprehensive Journal for Education and Science Publications (2019): 18.
9. Suji RE and Nishanthlalu GFA. “A Study on Effective Implementation of Apgar Test Among Health Care Professionals”. Indian Journal of Applied Research 4 (2014): 12.
10. Khorram B., et al. “Outcomes of Neonates with a 10-min Apgar Score of Zero: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Neonatology 31 (2022): 1-7.
11. Kornacka MK., et al. “Usefulness of the Apgar score: a national survey of Polish neonatal centers”. Ginekologia Polska1 (2011).
12. Jurdi SR., et al. “Evaluation of a comprehensive delivery room neonatal resuscitation and adaptation score (NRAS) compared to the Apgar score: a pilot study”. Global Pediatric Health 2 (2015): 2333794X15598293.
13. Akbar S., et al. “Knowledge and Awareness of Apgar Score Among Nurses of Jinnah Hospital Lahore Indo”. American Journal of Applied Sciences9 (2021).